Search options (Page 2 of 3)

I'm with Geoffrey; one of LotFP's great selling points is it's lack of bestiary. Too many RPGs of similar tone (WFRP, Cthulhu, etc) have fallen into the trap of cataloguing and speciation, with the finest of cosmetic details sufficient divergence for new entries. Whilst initially helpful the end results are almost uniformly repetitive and bland, culminating in hill dwarves, night goblins and fluffy Cthulhu. By contrast, an effective game of Lamentations results in players' never being able to anticipate what's lurking round the corner, stuffed up the chimney or swimming in the loo. Prior to running Death Love Doom I made my players explicitly aware of this -- their mounting dread as they made their way through the coach house before encountering Myrna was all the more potent for it.

Sir Wulf, that's amazing. Each idea is a worthy origin, indeed all of them can be used if one is exploiting the infinite shores idea. I particularly like the World of Coins, as a Londoner by birth and inclination the idea of the city bleeding into itself is something I can weirdly relate to. Cottle/Vogel is awesome, too. I'll have to use him if and when I run this myself. Fantastic stuff all round.

Well it's compulsory for referees running this to wear a bicorne.

Populating the Ship

The Plutonian is a gateway to other versions of itself. As such there will be alternates of the PCs wandering around. If you use house rules include one version of the party that’s by the book LotFP. Mine the threads here for kinky rules that reflect these strangers from other spheres. Think of all those campaign worlds you’ve never followed through on and have alternates originate from them. Stat these NPCs as they would appear under LotFP. Some of them are not yet aware of what they need to do to escape and may be amenable to alliances, at least for now.

The Plutonian has visited a thousand shores, so go nuts with monster types. Remember that there will typically be only one version (individual or group), unless they are recent arrivals who are hunting each other. Include evidence of such hunts, let the PCs join the dots till they realise what needs to be done or are ambushed by themselves. Be sure to describe each monster as it is, a unique and terrible thing from another world. If your setting is 17th century Europe and you decide to include, say, orcs, think about how a 6’, green, pig-headed murderer might actually appear if it walked through your front door. Make it as real as life and the horror will follow.

Thanks.

For pricing I was thinking 50/100/200 sp (Based on nothing more than available funds at 1st level!). Shot I'm unsure on; say 10% of the value of the weapon?

Encumbrance is exactly as you described. :0)

It is. I love WFRP and have done for years, but it's not a blind love.

Thanks. It felt like the more sensible option. Under this interpretation class, level and interactions with the game world replace advanced careers. A scout is a specialist who parleys bushcraft, search and stealth into coin. A mercenary captain is a 4th level fighter with a retinue of men-at-arms. A witch hunter is a cleric (or fighter, or specialist) who roots out chaos, real or imagined, and so on.

Yeah. My favourite is the line about every human who's ever lived in the real world being neutral. It really helps perspectify the amoral, cosmic nature of it all.

It's something I've toyed with over the last couple of years. I agree the setting as presented in 1E is a good fit.

The only kink I'd introduce is careers. Allow classes to pick from the following lists:

Fighter: Warrior

Cleric/Magic-user: Academic

Specialist: Ranger/Rogue

Dwarf: Warrior

Elf: Warrior/Academic

Halfling: Ranger

Careers would be mostly window dressing, a hook for the players. If, however, a career is relevant to an activity that requires a die roll and doesn't encroach on a Specialist skill then assume a rating of 2-4, depending on circumstances.

Agreed.

My last campaign took place in a variant of Elizabethan England. I explained to the players that, whilst many of the names might be the same, the geography and tenor of the place was rather different. The ferocious Henry VIII was commonly known as 'the Boar King' -- with appetites and predilections reputed to have manifested physically, possibly explaining the 12' sarcophagus at Westmynster. His daughter; Elizabeth, aka 'the wanton', 'whore-apostate' and 'Flame Princess' (!) was reputed to bed hundreds of men, draining them of their vitality to the point of death. Hampton Court was surrounded by a petrified hedge maze no sane man could navigate without the seal of the crown. Walsingham, Dee, Marley and Shaxbeard rubbed shoulders with Faustus, baby-eating fey and horrors from beyond the stars.

My approach was pretty simple -- I used whatever historical detail I knew (or could easily get hold of); the rest I made up -- and if anything the setting felt more authentic for doing so. Ask yourself: what man of that era had precise geographical knowledge of his homeland? Who knew what promises and appeasements were made by students of Temple Inn in exchange for the power to manipulate the King's law? It's all up for grabs if you as referee decide it to be so.

Yep. They're called Vagabonds in my game and, being human, can use full sized weapons. Works pretty well.

Elves I reskinned as changelings - not the sort presented in the sample adventure but faceless creatures swapped with human infants that grow to resemble the person they've replaced. They're biologically human but soulless, prey to inhuman dreams and vulnerable to the usual elven stuff. Part of the challenge of a changeling is figuring out why they were placed where they were and by whom, which will vary from character to character.

I see your point. Dwarves don't really feature in my games so I didn't consider their schtick too carefully. Maybe two hit points per Dwarf level would do it.